Conclusion
@What I have outlined in this paper is very likely quite challenging as it involves a radical repositions of the coach. It requires the coach to move from a position of authority and the source of all knowledge to adopt a role as a facilitator of learning. It involves working together with all the players to collectively develop skills and knowledge. This does not, however, mean that the coach does less work. In fact, the Game Sense approach initially involves a great deal of work in designing appropriate activities and questions. Rather than abandon current approaches to jump in the deep end I suggest that coaches interested in these ideas begin to gradually work them into existing training programs. As Kidman suggests, coaches will interpret Game Sense in different ways and will work it into their own coaching approaches and philosophy in particular ways12). Game Sense, however, is underpinned by a conceptualisation of coaching that is distinctly different from a 'traditional' approach that focuses on technical development and 'skill acquisition'. Game Sense can provide coaches with a means through which they can develop more complete players with adaptable skills, tactical understanding, vision and informed decision-making. Rugby games are chaotic in so many ways and good players must be able to makes sense of this chaos. To do this they must train within a game-like environment. Their skills must be developed in contexts that resemble those within which they must be performed in games. For too long many rugby coaches have tried to force fit a template of order on an activity that is complex, dynamic, unpredictable and often untidy. Games Sense provides a way through which coaches can strive to develop thinking players who can make sense of such often chaotic conditions and make a valuable contribution to the team effort.

Notes and References
1. Abernathy, B., Kippers, V., Mackinnon, L., Neal, R. and Harahan, S. (1996), The biophysical foundations of human movement. Macmillan
2. Greenwood, J. (1986), Think rugby: A guide to purposeful team play. A & C Black
3. Shiggy Konno, introduction in Greenwood (1986), p. 3.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1990), The logic of practice, Stanford University Press
5. Light, R. (2003), Making sense of chaos: Australian coaches talk about Game Sense. In: Examining a teaching games for understanding model, Griffin, L. and Butler, J. (Eds), Human Kinetics
6. For example see, Howarth, K. (2000), Context as a factor in teachers' perceptions of the teaching of thinking skills in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19(3): 270-286; Kirk, D. and MacPhail, A. (2002), Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker and Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21: 177-192
7. Abernathy et al; Light, R. and Fawns, R. (2001), The thinking body: Constructivist approaches to games teaching in physical education. Melbourne Studies in Education, 42(2): 69-88
8. Bunker, D. and Thorpe, R. (1982), A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1): 5-8
9. See for example, Light, R. (2002), The social nature of games: Australian pre-service primary teachers experiences of TGfU. European Physical Education Review, 8(2): 291-310; O'Reilly, E., Tompkins, J. and Gallant, M. (2001), "They ought to enjoy physical activity, you know?" Struggling with fun in Physical Education. Sport, Education and Society, 6(2): 211-22; Portman, J. (1995), 'Who is having fun in physical education classes? Experiences of sixth grade students in elementary and middle schools'. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14: 445-453
10. Australian Sports Commission (1991), Sport for young Australians: Widening the gateways to participation. Australian Sports Commission; Kidman, L. (2001), Developing decision makers: An empowerment approach to coaching. Innovative Print Communications.
11. Light, R. (2003), Making sense of chaos: Australian coaches talk about Game Sense.
12. Kidman, L. (2001). Developing decision makers: An empowerment approach to coaching. Innovative Print Communications